OVERVIEW OF ASIAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE

In Asian Parliamentary Style, there are 2 teams - Government and Opposition. Each team has 3 members and each team gives 4 speeches. The format is a limited preparation format, meaning that the topic is announced, depending on the tournament, roughly 30 minutes before the debate.
The 3 members of the Government should defend the motion. The 3 members of the team, each of which gives a 7 minute speech, are:
1. Prime Minister
2. Deputy Prime Minister
3. Government Whip
One speaker from the Government team - either the Prime Minister or Deputy Prime Minister - is charged with giving a 4 minute reply speech that clarifies the debate from the Government perspective without bringing forth new arguments.
The 3 members of the Opposition team should negate the motion and refute arguments brought forth by the Government. The 3 members of the team, each of which gives a 7 minute speech, are:
1. Leader of Opposition
2. Deputy Leader of Opposition
3. Opposition Whip
Like the Government team, one speaker from the Opposition team - either the Leader of Opposition or Deputy Leader of Opposition - is charged with giving a 4 minute reply speech that clarifies the debate from the Opposition perspective without bringing forth new arguments.
In the 7 minute speeches, the opposing team can stand up and ask for Points of Information (POI) after the first minute and until the sixth minute. A POI should be a brief question or comment and not a long-winded monologue or back and forth cross examination session.
 Times and Order of Asian Parliamentary Debate Speeches
 Prime Minister - 7 minutes
 Leader of Opposition - 7 minutes
 Deputy Prime Minister - 7 minutes
 Deputy Leader of Opposition - 7 minutes
 Government Whip - 7 minutes
 Opposition Whip - 7 minutes
 Opposition Reply Speech - 4 minutes
 Government Reply Speech - 4 minutes
 Speaker Roles in Asian Parliamentary Debate
A. Government:
1. Prime Minister (PM)
1) Define context and parameters of debate. For example, in an open motion like "This House Would Support Musicians", the debate could be contextualized into whether music should be a commodity for trade
2) Provide concise background or history leading to the issue
3) Give framework of government bench's case. I.e. mechanisms (if any), argumentation flow (what the government's first argument is and what the Deputy Prime Minister will talk about)
4) Introduce 1st argument
5) Assert Government stand
2. Deputy Prime Minister (DPM)
1) Rebut first argument from Leader of Opposition
2) Rebut rebuttals to PM's argument
3) Introduce 2nd and 3rd argument
4) Reassert Government stand and case

3. Government Whip
1) Rebut Deputy Leader of Opposition, and Leader of Opposition
2) Rebut rebuttals to DPM and PM arguments
3) Provide a deeper level of analysis for previous arguments and rebuttals
4) No new arguments, but new angles of arguments should be given
5) Brief summary of entire case of Government
6) Reassert Government stand and case

B. Opposition:
1. Leader of Opposition
1) Agree or disagree with context/ parameters of debate (any definitional challenges, accusations of squirreling, or unfair set up should be made from the LO speech and no later)
2) Rebut Prime Minister's argument
3) Give framework for Opposition case (if Opp agrees to problem, then their case should provide solution, or at least effectively highlight how Government proposal will worsen the situation)
4) Introduce first Opposition argument
5) Assert Opposition stand
2. Deputy Leader of Opposition
1) Rebut DPM and PM arguments
2) Rebut rebuttals to LO arguments
3) Introduce 1st and 2nd (if any) argument
4) Reassert Opposition stand and case
3. Opposition Whip
1) Rebut DPM and PM arguments
2) Rebut rebuttals to LO & DLO arguments
3) Provide a deeper level of analysis for previous arguments and rebuttals
4) No new arguments, but new angles of arguments should be given
5) Reassert Opposition stand and case
Reply Speech:
1) Can only be done by either 1st or 2nd speaker from each bench
2) Provide a biased 'oral adjudication' of why the debate should go to own bench
3) Highlight issues you think your side won, carefully tiptoe around issues you think you lost
4) New examples to expand on discussed examples is usually allowed and makes the reply speech sound fresh as opposed to verbal regurgitation
5) Reassert stand